↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating diverse electronic consultation programs with a common framework

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating diverse electronic consultation programs with a common framework
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12913-018-3626-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Delphine S. Tuot, Clare Liddy, Varsha G. Vimalananda, Jennifer Pecina, Elizabeth J. Murphy, Erin Keely, Steven R. Simon, Frederick North, Jay D. Orlander, Alice Hm Chen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 4 5%
Other 20 23%
Unknown 20 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 20%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Computer Science 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 25 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,515,166
of 16,651,312 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,081
of 5,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,282
of 327,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#214
of 763 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,651,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 763 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.