↓ Skip to main content

Reproducibility of the STARD checklist: an instrument to assess the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reproducibility of the STARD checklist: an instrument to assess the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2006
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-6-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nynke Smidt, Anne WS Rutjes, Daniëlle AWM van der Windt, Raymond WJG Ostelo, Patrick M Bossuyt, Johannes B Reitsma, Lex M Bouter, Henrica CW de Vet

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 5%
Switzerland 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 48 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Student > Master 8 15%
Professor 7 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2016.
All research outputs
#5,750,980
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#814
of 2,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,517
of 66,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them