You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The critical care management of poor-grade subarachnoid haemorrhage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-016-1193-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Airton Leonardo de Oliveira Manoel, Alberto Goffi, Tom R. Marotta, Tom A. Schweizer, Simon Abrahamson, R. Loch Macdonald |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 103 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 9% |
| Spain | 7 | 7% |
| Mexico | 5 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 3% |
| Colombia | 3 | 3% |
| Peru | 3 | 3% |
| Pakistan | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 39 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 73 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 17% |
| Scientists | 10 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 408 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 402 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 56 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 53 | 13% |
| Researcher | 52 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 9% |
| Other | 89 | 22% |
| Unknown | 85 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 218 | 53% |
| Neuroscience | 34 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 21 | 5% |
| Unknown | 100 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2022.
All research outputs
#692,128
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#463
of 6,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,332
of 410,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#6
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.