↓ Skip to main content

Lrp5/6 are required for cerebellar development and for suppressing TH expression in Purkinje cells via β-catenin

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Brain, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lrp5/6 are required for cerebellar development and for suppressing TH expression in Purkinje cells via β-catenin
Published in
Molecular Brain, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13041-015-0183-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying Huang, Qiong Zhang, Ning-Ning Song, Lei Zhang, Yu-Ling Sun, Ling Hu, Jia-Ying Chen, Weidong Zhu, Jue Li, Yu-Qiang Ding

Abstract

The cerebellum is responsible for coordinating motor functions and has a unique laminated architecture. Purkinje cells are inhibitory neurons and represent the only output from the cerebellar cortex. Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) is the key enzyme for the synthesis of catecholamines, including dopamine and noradrenaline, and it is normally not expressed in cerebellar neurons. We report here that the low-density lipoprotein receptors (Lrp) 5 and 6, Wnt co-receptors, are required for the development of the cerebellum and for suppressing ectopic TH expression in Purkinje cells. Simultaneous inactivation of Lrp 5 and 6 by Nestin-Cre results in defective lamination and foliation of the cerebellum during postnatal development. Surprisingly, TH is ectopically expressed by Purkinje cells, although they still keep its other neurochemical characteristics. These phenotypes are also observed in the cerebellum of GFAP-Cre;β-catenin(flox/flox) mice, and AAV2-Cre-mediated gene deletion leads to ectopic TH expression in Purkinje cells of β-catenin(flox/flox) mice as well. Our results revealed a new role of the canonical Lrp5/6-β-catenin pathway in regulating the morphogenesis of the cerebellum during postnatal development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 22%
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 22%
Neuroscience 6 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 19%
Computer Science 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2016.
All research outputs
#18,436,183
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Brain
#861
of 1,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,119
of 395,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Brain
#29
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.