You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Synthesising conceptual frameworks for patient and public involvement in research – a critical appraisal of a meta-narrative review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-018-0572-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Evans, Noreen Hopewell-Kelly, Michele Kok, Jo White |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 61% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 61% |
| Scientists | 7 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 28% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 16% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,464,630
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#181
of 2,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,359
of 354,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#8
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.