↓ Skip to main content

Tigmint: correcting assembly errors using linked reads from large molecules

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
59 X users

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tigmint: correcting assembly errors using linked reads from large molecules
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12859-018-2425-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shaun D. Jackman, Lauren Coombe, Justin Chu, Rene L. Warren, Benjamin P. Vandervalk, Sarah Yeo, Zhuyi Xue, Hamid Mohamadi, Joerg Bohlmann, Steven J.M. Jones, Inanc Birol

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 25%
Researcher 18 20%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 22 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 23%
Computer Science 7 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 24 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,177,698
of 23,850,698 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#137
of 7,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,817
of 353,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#3
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,850,698 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.