You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Time-to-event analysis to evaluate dormancy status of single-bud cuttings: an example for grapevines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-018-0361-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hector Camargo Alvarez, Melba Salazar-Gutiérrez, Diana Zapata, Markus Keller, Gerrit Hoogenboom |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 40% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2018.
All research outputs
#18,652,743
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#966
of 1,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,736
of 349,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#21
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.