↓ Skip to main content

The experience of interpreter access and language discordant clinical encounters in Australian health care: a mixed methods exploration

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 1,915)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The experience of interpreter access and language discordant clinical encounters in Australian health care: a mixed methods exploration
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12939-018-0865-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer White, Trish Plompen, Christian Osadnik, Leanne Tao, Emily Micallef, Terry Haines

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 160 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Other 8 5%
Student > Postgraduate 7 4%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 64 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 31 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 16%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 3%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 70 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2022.
All research outputs
#439,858
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#34
of 1,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,608
of 340,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#3
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,915 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.