↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: CMTX1 patients’ cells present genomic instability corrected by CamKII inhibitors

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: CMTX1 patients’ cells present genomic instability corrected by CamKII inhibitors
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13023-015-0354-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saleh Mones, Burkhard Gess, Benoit Bordignon, Alexandre Altié, Peter Young, Frederic Bihel, Marc Fraterno, Franck Peiretti, Michel Fontes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2016.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#2,952
of 3,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#347,143
of 405,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#30
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.