↓ Skip to main content

Protocol for the development of a CONSORT extension for RCTs using cohorts and routinely collected health data

Overview of attention for article published in Research Integrity and Peer Review, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protocol for the development of a CONSORT extension for RCTs using cohorts and routinely collected health data
Published in
Research Integrity and Peer Review, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s41073-018-0053-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda Kwakkenbos, Edmund Juszczak, Lars G Hemkens, Margaret Sampson, Ole Fröbert, Clare Relton, Chris Gale, Merrick Zwarenstein, Sinéad M Langan, David Moher, Isabelle Boutron, Philippe Ravaud, Marion K Campbell, Kimberly A Mc Cord, Tjeerd P van Staa, Lehana Thabane, Rudolf Uher, Helena M Verkooijen, Eric I Benchimol, David Erlinge, Maureen Sauvé, David Torgerson, Brett D Thombs

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Master 6 14%
Other 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 11 26%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 11 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,398,630
of 18,834,855 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#67
of 104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,647
of 334,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#12
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,834,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.