You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Risk factors for venous irritation in patients receiving vinorelbine: a retrospective study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40780-018-0122-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yoshihito Morimoto, Kumika Miyawaki, Reisuke Seki, Kazuhiro Watanabe, Masayoshi Hirohara, Takao Shinohara |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 10% |
| Engineering | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,244,982
of 23,109,468 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences
#20
of 148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,956
of 343,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,109,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 148 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them