↓ Skip to main content

Investigating possible fraudulent activity at a research site

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Investigating possible fraudulent activity at a research site
Published in
Trials, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-16-s2-p193
Authors

Carol Knott, Joanne Henderson, Louise Bowman, Martin Landray

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Librarian 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 25%
Engineering 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2018.
All research outputs
#4,117,546
of 13,710,419 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,647
of 3,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,817
of 309,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#353
of 518 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,710,419 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 518 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.