↓ Skip to main content

Synergistic chondroprotective effects of curcumin and resveratrol in human articular chondrocytes: inhibition of IL-1β-induced NF-κB-mediated inflammation and apoptosis

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
260 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Synergistic chondroprotective effects of curcumin and resveratrol in human articular chondrocytes: inhibition of IL-1β-induced NF-κB-mediated inflammation and apoptosis
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, November 2009
DOI 10.1186/ar2850
Pubmed ID
Authors

Constanze Csaki, Ali Mobasheri, Mehdi Shakibaei

Abstract

Currently available treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) are restricted to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which exhibit numerous side effects and are only temporarily effective. Thus novel, safe and more efficacious anti-inflammatory agents are needed for OA. Naturally occurring polyphenolic compounds, such as curcumin and resveratrol, are potent agents for modulating inflammation. Both compounds mediate their effects by targeting the NF-kappaB signalling pathway.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 172 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 19%
Student > Master 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 36 20%
Unknown 33 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 38 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,018,337
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#322
of 3,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,523
of 108,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#5
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.