You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A realistic evaluation: the case of protocol-based care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, May 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-5-38 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jo Rycroft-Malone, Marina Fontenla, Debra Bick, Kate Seers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 3% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Qatar | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 228 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 46 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 13% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 61 | 25% |
| Unknown | 31 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 50 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 15 | 6% |
| Psychology | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 10% |
| Unknown | 43 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,047,316
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,119
of 1,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,820
of 105,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.