You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prediction of mortality and functional outcome from status epilepticus and independent external validation of STESS and EMSE scores
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-016-1190-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bong Su Kang, Dong Wook Kim, Kwang Ki Kim, Hye Jin Moon, Young-Soo Kim, Hyun Kyung Kim, Seo-Young Lee, Yong Seo Koo, Jung-Won Shin, Jangsup Moon, Jun-Sang Sunwoo, Jung-Ick Byun, Yong Won Cho, Ki-Young Jung, Kon Chu, Sang Kun Lee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
South Africa | 1 | 8% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 23% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 12 | 17% |
Researcher | 9 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
Other | 17 | 24% |
Unknown | 13 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 51% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 11% |
Unknown | 15 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2016.
All research outputs
#4,953,055
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,322
of 6,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,453
of 411,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#56
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.