↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopically detected and nonsurgically managed ileal perforation by an ingested fish bone: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Laparoscopically detected and nonsurgically managed ileal perforation by an ingested fish bone: a case report
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13256-015-0526-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pramodh Chitral Chandrasinghe, Chandrasiri Karapitiya Pathirana

Abstract

Ileal perforation due to fish bone is a rare event. The condition is difficult to diagnose due to lack of specific clinical features and low sensitivity of imaging techniques. We report a case of ileal perforation by a fish bone that was detected laparoscopically and managed nonsurgically. A 45-year-old Sinhalese man presented with acute onset right iliac fossa pain and fever for three days. On examination, he had significant right iliac fossa tenderness and guarding. His white cell count and C-reactive protein level were elevated and an ultrasound scan was indicative of a bowel mass formation. A clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis was made and laparoscopic appendicectomy was scheduled. At initial survey, a thin spike-like structure was retrieved from the bowel mass, which was revealed to be a fish bone. Our patient was managed with antibiotics only and did not develop any complications. Ileal perforation due to fish bone is a rare condition that can mimic common conditions like appendicitis. Preoperative diagnosis is rarely made. The slow process of fish bone migration results in concomitant sealing of the perforation, reducing contamination. Use of laparoscopy may be useful in diagnosing this condition and preventing the morbidity of laparotomy in these patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 4 24%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 59%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%