You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Challenges of nurse delivery of psychological interventions for long-term conditions in primary care: a qualitative exploration of the case of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-132 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Peters, Alison Wearden, Richard Morriss, Christopher F Dowrick, Karina Lovell, Joanna Brooks, Greg Cahill, Carolyn Chew-Graham |
| Abstract |
The evidence base for a range of psychosocial and behavioural interventions in managing and supporting patients with long-term conditions (LTCs) is now well-established. With increasing numbers of such patients being managed in primary care, and a shortage of specialists in psychology and behavioural management to deliver interventions, therapeutic interventions are increasingly being delivered by general nurses with limited training in psychological interventions. It is unknown what issues this raises for the nurses or their patients. The purpose of the study was to examine the challenges faced by non-specialist nurses when delivering psychological interventions for an LTC (chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis [CFS/ME]) within a primary care setting. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 115 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 25 | 22% |
| United States | 7 | 6% |
| Australia | 5 | 4% |
| Ireland | 4 | 3% |
| France | 4 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Norway | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 104 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 4% |
| Scientists | 5 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 24 | 24% |
| Unknown | 19 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 22% |
| Psychology | 15 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 136. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#313,209
of 25,809,907 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#14
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,533
of 250,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.