You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementing universal Lynch syndrome screening (IMPULSS): protocol for a multi-site study to identify strategies to implement, adapt, and sustain genomic medicine programs in different organizational contexts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-018-3636-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Deborah Cragun, Jessica Ezzell Hunter, Mara M. Epstein, Jan Lowery, Christine Y. Lu, Pamala A. Pawloski, Ravi N. Sharaf, Su-Ying Liang, Andrea N. Burnett-Hartman, James M. Gudgeon, Jing Hao, Susan Snyder, Radhika Gogoi, Ilene Ladd, Marc S. Williams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 46% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 14% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 46% |
| Scientists | 12 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,505,490
of 24,488,567 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#491
of 8,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,912
of 355,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#22
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,488,567 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.