↓ Skip to main content

A community-based intervention (Young SMILES) to improve the health-related quality of life of children and young people of parents with serious mental illness: randomised feasibility protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A community-based intervention (Young SMILES) to improve the health-related quality of life of children and young people of parents with serious mental illness: randomised feasibility protocol
Published in
Trials, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13063-018-2935-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Judith Gellatly, Penny Bee, Lina Gega, Peter Bower, Diane Hunter, Paul Stewart, Nicky Stanley, Rachel Calam, Kim Holt, Miranda Wolpert, Simon Douglas, Jonathan Green, Adekeye Kolade, Craig Callender, Kathryn M Abel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 134 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 44 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 16%
Social Sciences 19 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 1%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 54 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2020.
All research outputs
#9,729,312
of 16,578,007 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#2,683
of 4,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,442
of 325,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#417
of 555 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,578,007 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 555 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.