↓ Skip to main content

Human endometrial regenerative cells attenuate renal ischemia reperfusion injury in mice

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human endometrial regenerative cells attenuate renal ischemia reperfusion injury in mice
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12967-016-0782-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peng Sun, Jian Liu, Wenwen Li, Xiaoxi Xu, Xiangying Gu, HongYue Li, Hongqiu Han, Caigan Du, Hao Wang

Abstract

Endometrial regenerative cells (ERCs) is an attractive novel type of adult mesenchymal stem cells that can be non-invasively obtained from menstrual blood and are easily replicated at a large scale without tumorigenesis. We have previously reported that ERCs exhibit unique immunoregulatory properties in experimental studies in vitro and in vivo. In this study, the protective effects of ERCs on renal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) were examined. Renal IRI in C57BL/6 mice was induced by clipping bilateral renal pedicles for 30 min, followed by reperfusion for 48 h. ERCs were isolated from healthy female menstrual blood, and were injected (1 million/mouse, i.v.) into mice 2 h prior to IRI induction. Renal function, pathological and immunohistological changes, cell populations and cytokine profiles were evaluated after 48 h of renal reperfusion. Here, we showed that as compared to untreated controls, administration of ERCs effectively prevented renal damage after IRI, indicated by better renal function and less pathological changes, which were associated with increased serum levels of IL-4, but decreased levels of TNF-α, IFN-γ and IL-6. Also, ERC-treated mice displayed significantly less splenic and renal CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell populations, while the percentage of splenic CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells and infiltrating M2 macrophages in the kidneys were significantly increased in ERC-treated mice. This study demonstrates that the novel anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory effects of ERCs are associated with attenuation of renal IRI, suggesting that the unique features of ERCs may make them a promising candidate for cell therapies in the treatment of ischemic acute kidney injury in patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 16 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Psychology 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 21 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2017.
All research outputs
#13,220,363
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,522
of 3,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,091
of 396,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#20
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.