↓ Skip to main content

Targeting oxidative stress to reduce osteoarthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Targeting oxidative stress to reduce osteoarthritis
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13075-015-0908-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Blandine Poulet, Frank Beier

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the commonest chronic disease, with an estimated 9.6 % of men and 18.0 % of women aged over 60 years having symptomatic OA according to the World Health Organisation. Despite this prevalence, no therapies to slow disease progression are currently available. Oxidative stress has been described as an important factor in various diseases, and more recently in OA. Evidence for using antioxidants to reduce OA severity is slowly accumulating but further understanding of their chondroprotective mechanisms in joint tissues is still required to demonstrate potential benefit to patients. A new study implicates the transcriptional repressor Bach-1 and its downstream target HO-1 as important players in this process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 66 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 15 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Engineering 4 6%
Chemistry 3 4%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 20 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2017.
All research outputs
#4,158,501
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#937
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,473
of 405,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#48
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.