↓ Skip to main content

Value of black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Value of black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-13-21
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gillian C Smith, John Paul Carpenter, Taigang He, Mohammed H Alam, David N Firmin, Dudley J Pennell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 45 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 49%
Engineering 7 14%
Computer Science 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,681,963
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#717
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,449
of 120,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.