↓ Skip to main content

Methods for the integration of multi-omics data: mathematical aspects

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
323 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
849 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methods for the integration of multi-omics data: mathematical aspects
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12859-015-0857-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matteo Bersanelli, Ettore Mosca, Daniel Remondini, Enrico Giampieri, Claudia Sala, Gastone Castellani, Luciano Milanesi

Abstract

Methods for the integrative analysis of multi-omics data are required to draw a more complete and accurate picture of the dynamics of molecular systems. The complexity of biological systems, the technological limits, the large number of biological variables and the relatively low number of biological samples make the analysis of multi-omics datasets a non-trivial problem. We review the most advanced strategies for integrating multi-omics datasets, focusing on mathematical and methodological aspects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 849 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 831 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 217 26%
Researcher 159 19%
Student > Master 99 12%
Student > Bachelor 58 7%
Student > Postgraduate 35 4%
Other 131 15%
Unknown 150 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 202 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 162 19%
Computer Science 106 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 4%
Engineering 36 4%
Other 118 14%
Unknown 188 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2023.
All research outputs
#5,284,655
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,820
of 7,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,861
of 407,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#35
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.