↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacist-managed clinics for patient education and counseling in Japan: current status and future perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pharmacist-managed clinics for patient education and counseling in Japan: current status and future perspectives
Published in
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40780-014-0001-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kiyofumi Yamada, Toshitaka Nabeshima

Abstract

To improve the adherence to and knowledge about pharmacotherapy in outpatients and to maximize the efficacy and minimize the adverse drug events, the first pharmacist-managed clinic (PMC) in Japan was established for anticoagulation therapy at Nagoya University Hospital in 2000. Since then, various PMCs such as for asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Alzheimer's disease, hypercholesterolemia, chronic hepatitis C, cancer chemotherapy, palliative care, chronic kidney disease, and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis have been established and expanded to many hospitals in Japan. Accumulating evidences suggest that PMCs have some beneficial effects on patients' adherence to and knowledge about their pharmacotherapy as well as the clinical outcome, besides being cost-effective. Notably, PMCs for cancer chemotherapy have been approved as a new medical service in hospitals in 2014, which is covered by the universal health coverage in Japan. In this review article, the current status of PMCs for patient education and counseling in Japan and their impact on pharmaceutical care and management are critically reviewed. Furthermore, future perspectives on PMCs are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 147 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Researcher 10 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 56 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 30 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 58 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2023.
All research outputs
#15,017,699
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences
#54
of 141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,557
of 359,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them