↓ Skip to main content

Reduction in hospital-wide mortality after implementation of a rapid response team: a long-term cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reduction in hospital-wide mortality after implementation of a rapid response team: a long-term cohort study
Published in
Critical Care, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/cc10547
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremy R Beitler, Nate Link, Douglas B Bails, Kelli Hurdle, David H Chong

Abstract

Rapid response teams (RRTs) have been shown to reduce cardiopulmonary arrests outside the intensive care unit (ICU). Yet the utility of RRTs remains in question, as most large studies have failed to demonstrate a significant reduction in hospital-wide mortality after RRT implementation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 121 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 18%
Researcher 18 14%
Other 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 37 30%
Unknown 12 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 15%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 14 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,509
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,647
of 152,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#17
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.