Title |
Effect of transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation on propofol sedation: an electroencephalogram analysis of patients undergoing pituitary adenomas resection
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12906-016-1008-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xing Liu, Jing Wang, Baoguo Wang, Ying Hua Wang, Qinglei Teng, Jiaqing Yan, Shuangyan Wang, You Wan |
Abstract |
Transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation (TAES) as a needleless acupuncture has the same effect like traditional manual acupuncture. The combination of TAES and anesthesia has been proved valid in enhancing the anesthetic effects but its mechanisms are still not clear. In this study, we investigated the effect of TAES on anesthesia with an electroencephalogram (EEG) oscillation analysis on surgery patients anesthetized with propofol, a widely-used anesthetic in clinical practice. EEG was continuously recorded during light and deep propofol sedation (target-controlled infusion set at 1.0 and 3.0 μg/mL) in ten surgery patients with pituitary tumor excision. Each concentration of propofol was maintained for 6 min and TAES was given at 2-4 min. The changes in EEG power spectrum at different frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma) and the coherence of different EEG channels were analyzed. Our result showed that, after TAES application, the EEG power increased at alpha and beta bands in light sedation of propofol, but reduced at delta and beta bands in deep propofol sedation (p < 0.001). In addition, the EEG oscillation analysis showed an enhancement of synchronization at low frequencies and a decline in synchronization at high frequencies between different EEG channels in either light or deep propofol sedation. Our study showed evidence suggested that TAES may have different effects on propofol under light and deep sedation. TAES could enhance the sedative effect of propofol at low concentration but reduce the sedative effect of propofol at high concentration. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 23 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Unknown | 27 | 46% |