You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Aberrant functional connectivity network in subjective memory complaint individuals relates to pathological biomarkers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Translational Neurodegeneration, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40035-018-0130-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kaicheng Li, Xiao Luo, Qingze Zeng, Yeerfan Jiaerken, Xiaojun Xu, Peiyu Huang, Zhujing Shen, Jingjing Xu, Chao Wang, Jiong Zhou, Min-Ming Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 19% |
| Unknown | 22 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 11 | 17% |
| Psychology | 10 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 26 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2018.
All research outputs
#4,838,109
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Translational Neurodegeneration
#233
of 384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,804
of 360,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Translational Neurodegeneration
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.