You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prices, peers, and perceptions (P3): study protocol for improved biomass cookstove project in northern Ghana
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-018-6116-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katherine L. Dickinson, Maxwell Dalaba, Zachary S. Brown, Rex Alirigia, Evan R. Coffey, Elise Mesenbring, Manies Achazanaga, Desmond Agao, Moro Ali, Ernest Kanyomse, Julius Awaregya, Clifford Amoah Adagenera, John Bosco A. Aburiya, Bernard Gubilla, Abraham Rexford Oduro, Michael P. Hannigan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ghana | 1 | 33% |
| Nepal | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 40 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 9% |
| Engineering | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 22% |
| Unknown | 42 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2019.
All research outputs
#12,993,628
of 23,109,468 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,964
of 15,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,985
of 350,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#190
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,109,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,070 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.