You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diagnostic value of end tidal capnography in patients with hyperglycemia in the emergency department
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Emergency Medicine, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12873-016-0072-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ralphe Bou Chebl, Bryan Madden, Justin Belsky, Elie Harmouche, Lenar Yessayan |
| Abstract |
Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA) is a potentially life-threatening emergency that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. In paediatric populations an end tidal capnography value greater than 36 mmHg was found to be 100 % sensitive in ruling out DKA. A cross sectional observational study of adults ≥ 17 years of age presenting to the emergency department between January 2014 and May 2014 with glucose > 550 mg/dL. In all patients, nasal capnography and venous blood gas analysis were performed prior to any insulin or intravenous fluid administration. The diagnosis of DKA was based on the presence of anion gap metabolic acidosis, hyperglycaemia and ketonemia. The overall diagnostic performance (area under the curve [AUC]), sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios at different end tidal CO2 (ETCO2) cut-offs were determined. 71 patients were enrolled in the study of which 21 (30 %) met the diagnosis of DKA. The area under the curve for ETCO2 was 0.95 with a 95 % CI of 0.91 to 0.99. Test sensitivity for DKA at ETCO2 level ≥35 mmHg was 100 % (95 % CI, 83.9-100). An ETCO2 level ≤ 21 mmHg was 100 % specific (95 % CI, 92.9-100.0) for DKA. Nasal capnography exhibits favourable diagnostic performance in detecting patients with or without DKA among those who present to the emergency department with a glucometer reading > 550 mg/dL. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 19% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 6% |
| Portugal | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 94% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Librarian | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 24% |
| Unknown | 16 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,796,769
of 25,601,426 outputs
Outputs from BMC Emergency Medicine
#45
of 881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,857
of 406,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Emergency Medicine
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,601,426 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.