You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Measures assessing attributes of evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) competence among nurses: a systematic review protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-018-0849-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily Belita, Jennifer Yost, Janet E. Squires, Rebecca Ganann, Trish Burnett, Maureen Dobbins |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 6 | 75% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 34 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 31 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,600,724
of 24,081,774 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#460
of 2,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,147
of 355,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#13
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,081,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.