↓ Skip to main content

Cluster randomised-control trial for an Australian child protection education program: Study protocol for the Learn to be safe with Emmy and friends™

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cluster randomised-control trial for an Australian child protection education program: Study protocol for the Learn to be safe with Emmy and friends™
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12889-016-2721-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Codi White, Dianne C. Shanley, Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck, Katrina Lines, Kerryann Walsh, Russell Hawkins

Abstract

Child maltreatment has severe short-and long-term consequences for children's health, development, and wellbeing. Despite the provision of child protection education programs in many countries, few have been rigorously evaluated to determine their effectiveness. We describe the design of a multi-site gold standard evaluation of an Australian school-based child protection education program. The intervention has been developed by a not-for-profit agency and comprises 5 1-h sessions delivered to first grade students (aged 5-6 years) in their regular classrooms. It incorporates common attributes of effective programs identified in the literature, and aligns with the Australian education curriculum. A three-site cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) of Learn to be safe with Emmy and friends™ will be conducted with children in approximately 72 first grade classrooms in 24 Queensland primary (elementary) schools from three state regions, over a period of 2 years. Entire schools will be randomised, using a computer generated list of random numbers, to intervention and wait-list control conditions, to prevent contamination effects across students and classes. Data will be collected at baseline (pre-assessment), immediately after the intervention (post-assessment), and at 6-, 12-, and 18-months (follow-up assessments). Outcome assessors will be blinded to group membership. Primary outcomes assessed are children's knowledge of program concepts; intentions to use program knowledge, skills, and help-seeking strategies; actual use of program material in a simulated situation; and anxiety arising from program participation. Secondary outcomes include a parent discussion monitor, parent observations of their children's use of program materials, satisfaction with the program, and parental stress. A process evaluation will be conducted concurrently to assess program performance. This RCT addresses shortcomings in previous studies and methodologically extends research in this area by randomising at school-level to prevent cross-learning between conditions; providing longer-term outcome assessment than any previous study; examining the degree to which parents/guardians discuss intervention content with children at home; assessing potential moderating/mediating effects of family and child demographic variables; testing an in-vivo measure to assess children's ability to discriminate safe/unsafe situations and disclose to trusted adults; and testing enhancements to existing measures to establish greater internal consistency. Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register ( ACTRN12615000917538 ). Registered (02/09/2015).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 212 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 12%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Master 22 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 72 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 64 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 8%
Social Sciences 15 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 2%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 75 35%