You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
UK Biobank's cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-016-0227-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steffen E. Petersen, Paul M. Matthews, Jane M. Francis, Matthew D. Robson, Filip Zemrak, Redha Boubertakh, Alistair A. Young, Sarah Hudson, Peter Weale, Steve Garratt, Rory Collins, Stefan Piechnik, Stefan Neubauer |
| Abstract |
UK Biobank's ambitious aim is to perform cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in 100,000 people previously recruited into this prospective cohort study of half a million 40-69 year-olds. We describe the CMR protocol applied in UK Biobank's pilot phase, which will be extended into the main phase with three centres using the same equipment and protocols. The CMR protocol includes white blood CMR (sagittal anatomy, coronary and transverse anatomy), cine CMR (long axis cines, short axis cines of the ventricles, coronal LVOT cine), strain CMR (tagging), flow CMR (aortic valve flow) and parametric CMR (native T1 map). This report will serve as a reference to researchers intending to use the UK Biobank resource or to replicate the UK Biobank cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol in different settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 30% |
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 73% |
| Scientists | 4 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 194 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 22% |
| Researcher | 35 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 45 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 34% |
| Engineering | 22 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 21 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 56 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,129,065
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#79
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,423
of 407,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#2
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.