↓ Skip to main content

Perspectives on the design and methodology of periconceptional nutrient supplementation trials

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perspectives on the design and methodology of periconceptional nutrient supplementation trials
Published in
Trials, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-1124-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernard J. Brabin, Sabine Gies, Stephen Owens, Yves Claeys, Umberto D’Alessandro, Halidou Tinto, Loretta Brabin

Abstract

Periconceptional supplementation could extend the period over which maternal and fetal nutrition is improved, but there are many challenges facing early-life intervention studies. Periconceptional trials differ from pregnancy supplementation trials, not only because of the very early or pre-gestational timing of nutrient exposure but also because they generate subsidiary information on participants who remain non-pregnant. The methodological challenges are more complex although, if well designed, they provide opportunities to evaluate concurrent hypotheses related to the health of non-pregnant women, especially nulliparous adolescents. This review examines the framework of published and ongoing randomised trial designs. Four cohorts typically arise from the periconceptional trial design - two of which are non-pregnant and two are pregnant - and this structure provides assessment options related to pre-pregnant, maternal, pregnancy and fetal outcomes. Conceptually the initial decision for single or micronutrient intervention is central - as is the choice of dosage and content - in order to establish a comparative framework across trials, improve standardisation, and facilitate interpretation of mechanistic hypotheses. Other trial features considered in the review include: measurement options for baseline and outcome assessments; adherence to long-term supplementation; sample size considerations in relation to duration of nutrient supplementation; cohort size for non-pregnant and pregnant cohorts as the latter is influenced by parity selection; integrating qualitative studies and data management issues. Emphasis is given to low resource settings where high infection rates and the possibility of nutrient-infection interactions may require appropriate safety monitoring. The focus is on pragmatic issues that may help investigators planning a periconceptional trial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 109 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 15%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 4 4%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 39 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 14%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 43 39%