↓ Skip to main content

Helicobacter pylori: a poor man's gut pathogen?

Overview of attention for article published in Gut Pathogens, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 600)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Helicobacter pylori: a poor man's gut pathogen?
Published in
Gut Pathogens, March 2010
DOI 10.1186/1757-4749-2-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammed Mahdy Khalifa, Radwa Raed Sharaf, Ramy Karam Aziz

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori is one of the human pathogens with highest prevalence around the world; yet, its principal mode of transmission remains largely unknown. The role of H. pylori in gastric disease and cancer has not been established until the end of the 20th century. Since then, its epidemiology has been extensively studied, and an accruing body of literature suggests that not all humans are equally at risk of infection by this gut pathogen. Here, we briefly review the different epidemiological aspects of H. pylori infection with emphasis on those factors related to human poverty. The epidemiology of H. pylori infection is characterized by marked differences between developing and developed countries, notably among children. In addition, congruent lines of evidence point out to socioeconomic factors and living standards as main determinants of the age-dependent acquisition rate of H. pylori, and consequently its prevalence. These data are alarming in the light of the changing global climate and birth rate, which are expected to change the demography of our planet, putting more children at risk of H. pylori and its complications for years to come.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
India 2 1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 189 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 16%
Student > Bachelor 28 14%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 39 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 49 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#978,934
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Gut Pathogens
#15
of 600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,891
of 103,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut Pathogens
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them