↓ Skip to main content

Targeting autophagy to sensitive glioma to temozolomide treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
235 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Targeting autophagy to sensitive glioma to temozolomide treatment
Published in
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13046-016-0303-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuanliang Yan, Zhijie Xu, Shuang Dai, Long Qian, Lunquan Sun, Zhicheng Gong

Abstract

Temozolomide (TMZ), an alkylating agent, is widely used for treating primary and recurrent high-grade gliomas. However, the efficacy of TMZ is often limited by the development of resistance. Recently, studies have found that TMZ treatment could induce autophagy, which contributes to therapy resistance in glioma. To enhance the benefit of TMZ in the treatment of glioblastomas, effective combination strategies are needed to sensitize glioblastoma cells to TMZ. In this regard, as autophagy could promote cell survival or autophagic cell death, modulating autophagy using a pharmacological inhibitor, such as chloroquine, or an inducer, such as rapamycin, has received considerably more attention. To understand the effectiveness of regulating autophagy in glioblastoma treatment, this review summarizes reports on glioblastoma treatments with TMZ and autophagic modulators from in vitro and in vivo studies, as well as clinical trials. Additionally, we discuss the possibility of using autophagy regulatory compounds that can sensitive TMZ treatment as a chemotherapy for glioma treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 201 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 14%
Student > Master 28 14%
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 53 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 12%
Neuroscience 11 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 59 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,778,730
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#478
of 2,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,760
of 405,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#4
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,379 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.