You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A pilot study for channel catfish whole genome sequencing and de novo assembly
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-12-629 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yanliang Jiang, Jianguo Lu, Eric Peatman, Huseyin Kucuktas, Shikai Liu, Shaolin Wang, Fanyue Sun, Zhanjiang Liu |
| Abstract |
Recent advances in next-generation sequencing technologies have drastically increased throughput and significantly reduced sequencing costs. However, the average read lengths in next-generation sequencing technologies are short as compared with that of traditional Sanger sequencing. The short sequence reads pose great challenges for de novo sequence assembly. As a pilot project for whole genome sequencing of the catfish genome, here we attempt to determine the proper sequence coverage, the proper software for assembly, and various parameters used for the assembly of a BAC physical map contig spanning approximately a million of base pairs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 6% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 29% |
| Researcher | 22 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 63% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 10 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2011.
All research outputs
#18,836,571
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#8,272
of 10,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,332
of 245,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#221
of 295 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,745 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 295 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.