↓ Skip to main content

Greater improvement in LRRK2 G2019S patients undergoing Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation compared to non-mutation carriers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neuroscience, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 1,245)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Greater improvement in LRRK2 G2019S patients undergoing Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation compared to non-mutation carriers
Published in
BMC Neuroscience, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12868-016-0240-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Massiva Sayad, Mohamed Zouambia, Malika Chaouch, Farida Ferrat, Mustapha Nebbal, Mohamed Bendini, Suzanne Lesage, Alexis Brice, Mohamed Brahim Errahmani, Boualem Asselah

Abstract

Bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) of parkinson's disease (PD) patients has demonstrated to improve motor performance and to reduce dopa-induced dyskinesia. An association between the occurrence of dyskinesias and LRRK2 (leucine-rich repeat kinase 2) G2019S gene mutations has recently been suggested. The aim of this study is to discover the impact of the G2019S mutation (with high incidence in the authors' native Algeria) on the symptom response of PD in patients who underwent STN-DBS. We carried out a comparative statistical study for the clinical evaluation and neuropsychological assessment of 27 Algerian PD STN-DBS patients, both G2019S mutation carriers (MC) and non-carriers (NC). A multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was then conducted to compare the results with those from groups of individuals with similar modalities. The MCA revealed that MC and NC PD patients showed two different patterns of clinical evaluations. The group of idiopathic patients showed some differences compared to the clinical evaluations, depending on gender. No association was found between the G2019S mutation and the Mini Mental State Examination scores (MMSE), and MC patients appeared more susceptible to dyskinesia than NC patients. In NC patients, we found two cases with Parkin mutations who had a different "honeymoon" period and different initial symptoms. The results showed considerable improvement of motor unified parkinson's disease rating scale III (UPDRS-III) in a situation of stimulation without medication in the MC patients with a percentage of improvement (51.1 %) over the required 30 % compared to the NC patients (25.5 %). The same result was observed for the Schwab and England's activities of daily living scale (S and E scale), which thus demonstrated a greater effectiveness of DBS for MC patients than for NC patients. However, the Hoehn and Yahr scale (H and Y Scale) showed the same significance in a situation of stimulation for MC and NC patients. In this later group, the best scores of UPDRS-III were observed for patients with the Parkin mutation before they underwent surgery. This study shows that surgical treatment probably has a more significant impact on LRRK2 G2019S MC than on idiopathic patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 17%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 30 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 22%
Neuroscience 13 13%
Psychology 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 33 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2016.
All research outputs
#1,794,689
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#44
of 1,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,220
of 397,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,245 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.