↓ Skip to main content

The effect of individualized NUTritional counseling on muscle mass and treatment outcome in patients with metastatic COLOrectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy: a randomized controlled trial protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of individualized NUTritional counseling on muscle mass and treatment outcome in patients with metastatic COLOrectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy: a randomized controlled trial protocol
Published in
BMC Cancer, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12885-015-1092-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne van der Werf, Susanne Blauwhoff-Buskermolen, Jacqueline AE Langius, Johannes Berkhof, Henk MW Verheul, Marian AE de van der Schueren

Abstract

A low muscle mass is prevalent in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and has been associated with poor treatment outcome. Chemotherapeutic treatment has an additional unfavorable effect on muscle mass. Sufficient protein intake and physical activity are known to induce muscle protein anabolism in healthy individuals, however it is unclear whether optimal nutrition is effective to preserve muscle mass in patients with mCRC during first-line chemotherapy as well. We hypothesize that individual nutritional counseling by a trained dietitian during first-line chemotherapy is effective in preserving muscle mass and may improve clinical outcomes in patients with mCRC. In this multi-center single-blind randomized controlled trial, patients with mCRC scheduled for first-line combination chemotherapy consisting of oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine, with or without bevacizumab (n = 110), will be randomized to receive either individualized nutritional counseling by a trained dietitian to achieve a sufficient dietary intake and an adequate physical activity level, or usual care. Outcome measures will be assessed at baseline and after two and four months of treatment. The primary endpoint will be the change in skeletal muscle area (measured by CT-scan) at the first treatment evaluation. Secondary endpoints will be quality of life, physical functioning, treatment toxicity, treatment intensity and survival. Statistical analyses include one-sided t-tests for the primary endpoint and mixed models and the Kaplan-Meier method for secondary endpoints. This randomized controlled trial will provide evidence whether individualized nutritional counseling during chemotherapy is effective in preventing loss of muscle mass in patients with mCRC. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01998152 ; Netherlands Trial Register NTR4223 .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 156 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Researcher 18 11%
Other 14 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 45 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 15%
Sports and Recreations 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 55 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2016.
All research outputs
#20,303,950
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#6,500
of 8,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,524
of 257,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#156
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,313 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.