↓ Skip to main content

Progress and gaps in reproductive health services in three humanitarian settings: mixed-methods case studies

Overview of attention for article published in Conflict and Health, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
5 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Progress and gaps in reproductive health services in three humanitarian settings: mixed-methods case studies
Published in
Conflict and Health, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/1752-1505-9-s1-s3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara E Casey, Sarah K Chynoweth, Nadine Cornier, Meghan C Gallagher, Erin E Wheeler

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Thailand 1 <1%
Unknown 265 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 72 27%
Researcher 28 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Other 11 4%
Other 33 12%
Unknown 78 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 18%
Social Sciences 40 15%
Psychology 6 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 88 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,123,459
of 24,213,825 outputs
Outputs from Conflict and Health
#188
of 611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,694
of 360,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conflict and Health
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,213,825 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.