↓ Skip to main content

Vaccine hesitancy: understanding better to address better

Overview of attention for article published in Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 625)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
195 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
449 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vaccine hesitancy: understanding better to address better
Published in
Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13584-016-0062-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dewesh Kumar, Rahul Chandra, Medha Mathur, Saurabh Samdariya, Neelesh Kapoor

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy is an emerging term in the socio-medical literature which describes an approach to vaccine decision making. It recognizes that there is a continuum between full acceptance and outright refusal of some or all vaccines and challenges the previous understanding of individuals or groups, as being either anti-vaccine or pro-vaccine. The behaviours responsible for vaccine hesitancy can be related to confidence, convenience and complacency. The causes of vaccine hesitancy can be described by the epidemiological triad i.e. the complex interaction of environmental- (i.e. external), agent- (i.e. vaccine) and host (or parent)- specific factors. Vaccine hesitancy is a complex and dynamic issue; future vaccination programs need to reflect and address these context-specific factors in both their design and evaluation. Many experts are of the view that it is best to counter vaccine hesitancy at the population level. They believe that it can be done by introducing more transparency into policy decision-making before immunization programs, providing up-to-date information to the public and health providers about the rigorous procedures undertaken before introduction of new vaccines, and through diversified post-marketing surveillance of vaccine-related events.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 449 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Unknown 448 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 82 18%
Student > Bachelor 53 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 7%
Researcher 26 6%
Student > Postgraduate 25 6%
Other 72 16%
Unknown 161 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 10%
Social Sciences 36 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 4%
Psychology 16 4%
Other 70 16%
Unknown 175 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,071,555
of 25,301,208 outputs
Outputs from Israel Journal of Health Policy Research
#34
of 625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,748
of 409,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Israel Journal of Health Policy Research
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,301,208 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.