You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Mixed-methods single-arm repeated measures study evaluating the feasibility of a web-based intervention to support family carers of persons with dementia in long-term care facilities
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, October 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40814-018-0356-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wendy Duggleby, Kathya Jovel Ruiz, Jenny Ploeg, Carrie McAiney, Shelley Peacock, Cheryl Nekolaichuk, Jayna Holroyd-Leduc, Sunita Ghosh, Kevin Brazil, Jennifer Swindle, Dorothy Forbes, Sandra Woodhead Lyons, Jasneet Parmar, Sharon Kaasalainen, Laura Cottrell, Jillian Paragg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 12% |
Unknown | 35 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 17% |
Psychology | 8 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 37 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2018.
All research outputs
#15,824,751
of 23,513,114 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#748
of 1,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,518
of 352,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#28
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,513,114 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.