↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation and surgical resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Gastroenterology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation and surgical resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma
Published in
BMC Gastroenterology, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-230x-11-143
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroki Nishikawa, Tadashi Inuzuka, Haruhiko Takeda, Jun Nakajima, Fumihiro Matsuda, Azusa Sakamoto, Shinichiro Henmi, Keiichi Hatamaru, Tetsuro Ishikawa, Sumio Saito, Akihiro Nasu, Ryuichi Kita, Toru Kimura, Akira Arimoto, Yukio Osaki

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to compare the outcome of percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation therapy (PRFA) with surgical resection (SR) in the treatment of single and small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Canada 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Japan 1 3%
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 34 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Student > Master 4 10%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 10 25%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 60%
Engineering 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2012.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from BMC Gastroenterology
#826
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,932
of 243,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Gastroenterology
#11
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.