↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of MCQ and distractor use in a large first year Health Faculty Foundation Program: assessing the effects of changing from five to four options

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of MCQ and distractor use in a large first year Health Faculty Foundation Program: assessing the effects of changing from five to four options
Published in
BMC Medical Education, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12909-018-1346-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolette Fozzard, Andrew Pearson, Eugene du Toit, Helen Naug, William Wen, Ian R. Peak

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Lecturer 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 13 24%
Unknown 18 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 24%
Social Sciences 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Chemistry 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 22 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2018.
All research outputs
#15,550,873
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,300
of 3,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,995
of 352,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#66
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.