You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stress ulcer prophylaxis in adult neurocritical care patients—no firm evidence for benefit or harm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-016-1188-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mette Krag, Anders Perner, Jørn Wetterslev, Morten Hylander Møller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 2% |
| Maldives | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 25 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 19% |
| Scientists | 4 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 19% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 69% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2016.
All research outputs
#1,173,403
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#981
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,070
of 406,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#17
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.