You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validation of a rapid semi-automated method to assess left atrial longitudinal phasic strains on cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-018-0496-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shuang Leng, Ru-San Tan, Xiaodan Zhao, John C. Allen, Angela S. Koh, Liang Zhong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 14% |
| Germany | 2 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Russia | 1 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
| Scientists | 4 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 50% |
| Engineering | 3 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,329,057
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#100
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,481
of 365,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.