You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
G6PD deficiency, primaquine treatment, and risk of haemolysis in malaria-infected patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-018-2564-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara Avalos, Rosa E. Mejia, Engels Banegas, Cesar Salinas, Lester Gutierrez, Marcela Fajardo, Suzeth Galo, Alejandra Pinto, Angel Mejia, Gustavo Fontecha |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 17% |
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 11% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2020.
All research outputs
#6,863,058
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,901
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,802
of 356,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#48
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.