↓ Skip to main content

HTA and MCDA solely or combined? The case of priority-setting in Colombia

Overview of attention for article published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 538)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HTA and MCDA solely or combined? The case of priority-setting in Colombia
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12962-018-0127-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Héctor E. Castro, Ornella Moreno-Mattar, Juan C. Rivillas

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 15%
Other 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 21 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 16%
Social Sciences 7 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Engineering 3 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 21 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,233,405
of 25,463,724 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#38
of 538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,239
of 362,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#3
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,724 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.