↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with chronic low back pain: Design, method and protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with chronic low back pain: Design, method and protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-12-290
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kerstin Luedtke, Alison Rushton, Christine Wright, Tim P Juergens, Gerd Mueller, Arne May

Abstract

Electrical stimulation of central nervous system areas with surgically implanted stimulators has been shown to result in pain relief. To avoid the risks and side effects of surgery, transcranial direct current stimulation is an option to electrically stimulate the motor cortex through the skull. Previous research has shown that transcranial direct current stimulation relieves pain in patients with fibromyalgia, chronic neuropathic pain and chronic pelvic pain. Evidence indicates that the method is pain free, safe and inexpensive.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 243 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 16%
Student > Bachelor 35 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 13%
Researcher 29 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 60 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 20%
Psychology 43 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 11%
Neuroscience 22 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 68 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2014.
All research outputs
#8,253,271
of 25,546,214 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,592
of 4,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,549
of 250,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#16
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,546,214 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.