↓ Skip to main content

Venous thromboembolism and persistent pulmonary hypertension in cancer patients: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Thrombosis Journal, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Venous thromboembolism and persistent pulmonary hypertension in cancer patients: a cross-sectional study
Published in
Thrombosis Journal, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12959-016-0077-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Siegfried Wieshammer, Jens Dreyhaupt, Dirk Müller, Felix Momm, Andreas Jakob

Abstract

Cancer patients are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). This monocenter cross-sectional study prospectively assessed the association between a history of ≥1 VTE episode and the presence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) among cancer patients presenting with pulmonary or cardiac symptoms. A consecutive series of 583 patients underwent a diagnostic work-up for heart and lung disease. PH was diagnosed if a patient's peak systolic pressure gradient across the tricuspid valve was ≥35 mmHg, as measured by echocardiography. Using multiple logistic regression analysis, the association between VTE and PH was assessed, following adjustments for age, the presence of severe airway obstruction, atrial fibrillation and left heart diseases. The prevalence values for PH (n = 90) and a history of VTE (n = 72) were 15.4 and 12.3 %, respectively. The median time interval between the first VTE episode and referral was 43 months. The odds of PH was higher in the subgroup with VTE (19/72; 26.4 %) than that without VTE (71/511; 13.9 %) in the unadjusted analysis [odds ratio (OR) 2.2, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.2, 4.0] and the adjusted model [OR 2.4, 95 % CI 1.2, 4.5]. The risk of PH did not depend on the time interval between VTE and referral. Older age and the presence of severe airway obstruction, atrial fibrillation, and left heart diseases were also associated with an increased odds of PH. In cancer patients presenting with cardiac or pulmonary symptoms, previous VTE is associated with an increased risk of persistent PH.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 29%
Other 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Professor 1 7%
Lecturer 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 14%
Psychology 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,251,299
of 24,135,931 outputs
Outputs from Thrombosis Journal
#121
of 375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,810
of 407,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thrombosis Journal
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,135,931 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.