You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nano-silver-incorporated biomimetic polydopamine coating on a thermoplastic polyurethane porous nanocomposite as an efficient antibacterial wound dressing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-018-0416-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Menglong Liu, Tengfei Liu, Xiwei Chen, Jiacai Yang, Jun Deng, Weifeng He, Xiaorong Zhang, Qiang Lei, Xiaohong Hu, Gaoxing Luo, Jun Wu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 5 | 71% |
| Sweden | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 45 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 15 | 14% |
| Materials Science | 10 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 47 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,457,752
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#173
of 2,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,202
of 357,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,004 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.